After a gala, one of the first numbers most organizations look at is attendance.
"We had 300 people!"
That feels like a win.
And don't get me wrong. Attendance absolutely matters.
But if you're trying to understand how well your gala actually performed, attendance only tells part of the story.
One of my favorite gala performance metrics answers a much more important question: How much fundraising potential was in the room, and how well did your program unlock it?
After many galas, I hear some version of this:
"It felt better than last year."
Maybe the room had more energy.
Maybe people seemed more engaged.
Maybe you even raised more money.
Those are all good signs. But they don't necessarily tell you whether your room performed as well as it could have.
Here's what I mean.
Imagine you're walking downtown and you see a restaurant packed wall to wall. Every table is full.
Your first thought is probably, "They must be making a killing tonight."
But what if every table only spent $5?
Now imagine the exact same restaurant with the exact same number of people, except every table spends $300.
From the sidewalk, those two restaurants look identical. Financially, they're completely different.
Your gala works the same way.
A full ballroom doesn't automatically mean you had a high-performing fundraising event.
That's why attendance, by itself, isn't enough.
Two of my favorite metrics to calculate after every gala are:
Together, these numbers tell you far more than attendance ever will.
The formula is simple:
Paddle raise total ÷ total number of guests = paddle raise revenue per guest
This tells you, on average, how much each guest contributed during the paddle raiser.
Here's the benchmark I like to use.
Your paddle raise revenue per guest should be higher than your individual ticket price.
So if your ticket price was $150, I'd like to see your paddle raise revenue per guest exceed $150.
If it's right around your ticket price, that's a decent place to start. If it's significantly above your ticket price, your room is generally responding well.
The second metric is paddle raise revenue per bidder card, or essentially per household.
The formula is:
Paddle raise total ÷ number of bidder cards = paddle raise revenue per card
Because many households give together, this number should be much higher than your revenue per guest.
As a general benchmark, I often like to see it land around three to four times your revenue per guest.
Neither of these numbers tells the whole story on its own. But together, they give you a much clearer picture of how your room responded once the fundraising began.
Let's say an organization tells me:
"Our paddle raiser brought in $20,000, and we had 400 guests."
At first glance, $20,000 sounds great.
But let's calculate the metric.
$20,000 ÷ 400 guests = $50 per guest.
Unless the event was free to attend, that's telling us there's room for improvement.
It doesn't mean the gala wasn't successful. It doesn't mean people weren't generous. It simply gives us another piece of information.
And that's the goal.
These metrics aren't meant to make you feel good or bad about your event. They're meant to help you understand what happened.
If your revenue per guest or revenue per card is lower than you'd hoped, there are usually a few places worth exploring.
First, look at who was in the room. Did you have enough mission-aligned donors and supporters who had both the capacity and the desire to give?
Sometimes that conversation also includes your ticket price and whether it's attracting the audience you're hoping to reach. (See Gala Performance Metrics: Why Your Ticket Price Matters More Than You Think to learn more)
Second, look at your program.
Even with the right audience, donors need a compelling reason to give.
Was your story donor-centric?
Did guests clearly understand the impact of their gift?
Did they leave feeling like their generosity could truly make a difference?
These metrics won't answer every question. But they'll point you toward the right ones.
(See Getting Your Donors to Pay Attention: Part 2: Creating a Captivating Program to learn more about captivating programs)
People sometimes ask why I don't use total event revenue for these calculations.
The reason is simple. In my methodology, the paddle raiser should be the largest and most intentional fundraising moment of the evening.
It's where donor connection, storytelling, stewardship, and the ask all come together.
When your paddle raiser performs well, your other fundraising streams become the icing on the cake.
That's why I believe it's one of the clearest ways to measure how well your gala program is working.
Once you've calculated these numbers, don't stop there.
Track them year after year.
Over time, you'll start to see trends that attendance alone could never reveal.
You'll know whether your fundraising strategy is improving.
You'll know whether your room is becoming more generous.
And you'll have a much better understanding of whether the changes you're making are actually working.
Instead of saying, "This year's gala felt better," you'll have the data to explain why.
Attendance matters. Total revenue matters. But if you really want to understand how well your gala performed, start tracking paddle raise revenue per guest and paddle raise revenue per bidder card.
They're two simple calculations that can completely change the way you evaluate your event.
Because the question isn't just how many people showed up. It's how much fundraising potential was in the room, and how well your program helped unlock it.
If you'd like to learn more about building a stronger paddle raiser, check out my article: Nervous About Your First Paddle Raiser? Do These 3 Things